A post on identifying sluts by an Alpha wannabe (who has Cartmanesque hysterical fits whenever a female commenter doesn’t recognize his authoritaah) sparked some interesting comments. Some of them suggested as a way to flush out (shit test) sluts, that a man pretend to be open minded and non judgemental before springing the question of how many men she’s had sex with on her.
I thought of replying: You guys do realize, don’t you, that it is much easier for a whore to keep her legs closed than it is for a woman who sincerely likes you. By condemning “sluts”, and defining so many women with good intentions as such, you’re basically shooting yourselves in the foot.
If you ask a woman with an IQ over 80 or so, how many men she has slept with, and she hasn’t seen any actual evidence of your open mindedness other than your saying so, she will assume that you are looking for a reason to dump her. It is a well known male shit test. So perhaps the reason some become more forthcoming with information once asked is not because you successfully deceived her, but because at that point she understands she has nothing to lose.
Younger women who don’t know it’s a shit test will fall for it maybe once. Whores will lie anyway, if they consider you a sponsor for their retirement plan.
But, ladies, these kinds of attitudes are why it’s best to keep it in your pants. In order to have a free society, it takes men and women. Apparently the men haven’t caught up, at least in the case of the (beta) masses.
What is striking is that so many of these men claim to be speaking for the Alpha male, who doesn’t want to get saddles with a woman who’s a “bad investment”. Yet among the actual Alphas I know, it is common for their partners to have had turbulent and what some would define as slutty pasts. They don’t feel particularly insecure about a woman not being a virgin.
What the social status conscious may care about is image, but this is for the sake of finding a suitable trophy, if one is needed. If they have their way though, the woman’s sexual appetite would match or surpass his own.
This is why the beta PUA is instructed to pretend to be non judgemental: because sexual freedom and lack of insecurity around it is an Alpha trait.
So the moment the guy loses the mask, and starts down the road of threatening to judge her for her numbers rather than her conduct in the face of the constant barrage of sexual attention that a higher beta or Alpha type female gets, the jig is up. He’s shown himself to be a beta, so the non whore reaction is an end game slam: tell him how many have been there before him, and let him know that he’s not as special at he’d like to think he is.
No matter what, his reaction to her answer is going to be that of a beta, because the question is a beta question to ask. The motivation to even ask such a question out loud is beta. So he can choose to either take it on the chin or on the belly…to let it slide or to crawl away with his ego bruised from the self inflicted trauma of idealizing virginity or near virginity above ethical conduct.
There is nothing wrong with being beta. Not every guy can be a Colin Powel or a Bertrand Russell. A guy just needs to be real with himself and with the women he chooses to spend time with. If he wants a virgin or near virgin for a wife, he needs to take his butt back to church, mosque, or synagogue, and find himself a fresh 18-20 year old. He’s not going to find them elsewhere.
Seducing secular women means that he should not expect her to have been perfectly chaste outside of marriage. To deceive her into thinking he’s okay with her, and then turning around and shaming her isn’t motivated by a simple cost/benefit analysis. It comes from the idea that one is a predator, and that sex is a means of subjugating women. Like the female whore, the male whore isn’t in this kind of scenario for the sex or the bonding. He wants to humiliate someone…to feel superior as he disqualifies or dumps her according to a standard that he himself did not live up to.
Read the post, and Google for others like it. Identifying sluts is a very popular topic, and it’s easy to tell the ones who are really talking about women who use sex as currency, and those who are trying to shame women for enjoying their sexuality. Apparently, the mainstream opinion is that a woman who will have sex with a guy before they are cohabiting is a slut who deserves to be shunned once he is done using her…not just by him, but by every man after him.
So the next time a guy tells you he’s open minded, if you don’t know his history, beware. If none of his prior ltr’s can vouch for him, and he’s not an active member or participant in any freak/alternative movements or communities, call bullshit. He might just be looking for reasons to justify lying to you and later trying to humiliate you.