You are currently browsing the archives for July 2009

Prudes in Paris?

  • Posted on July 26, 2009 at 1:51 pm

According to Time Magazine, France is seeing an upsurge in “prudishness”.  The proving ground of many if not most western fashion and social trends, was slutting it up only last year.  Apparently, the reality of the consequences has hit hard and fast, so the buzzword du jour is “pudique“.

Though 62-63 million is not a number to sniff at, it may be the smaller population that has accelerated the French evolution beyond the sexual revolution.  Those who once turned up their noses at others’ “puritanical” ways are now seeing that a balanced and realistic approach to sexuality doesn’t require religious enforcement.  Aggressively secular people can realize that you can’t fool Mother Nature.

Will it catch on?  I hope so.  Though I’m not too big on trends, this is at least one that makes some kind of sense.

Bitch Shield vs. Prude Shield

  • Posted on at 6:00 am
I do, but not with you.

I do, but not with you.

In the comments on men’s PUA sites occasionally someone says something that’s useful for women.  In this case, Mike posted about the difference between the “bitch shield” and the “prude shield”.
You’ve probably read hundreds of dating and marriage experts say that mistrust is very unattractive.  Yet the same people say that it’s a bad idea for a girl to seem too easy because there are so many cads out there.  It’s difficult to parse what exactly it is that they’re saying.It’s confusing because there’s a conflict between the modern trend of more liberal attitudes about sex and gender roles, and the actual biological, psychological, and social needs of humans. 
The old system was just as bad as far as feasability.  If women aren’t allowed to work or to vote then they’re doubly vulnerable than men who will suffer greatly under the yoke of political and economic oppression.  As they say, sh*t rolls downhill.
So although having freedom is a good thing, having a brain is as well.  However, if someone doesn’t know that they have an option, they won’t know to use it.  This is where the “bitch shield” comes in.
Women are wired to filter out losers.  No matter what has ever been fashionable or traditional, no woman is happy about being trapped with a wuss of a man.  Though some women are more tolerant of guys with lower incomes, the vast majority also don’t want to get involved with a guy who doesn’t have the resources to sustain or improve the lifestyle she is accustomed to.  We’re being real here.  Very few women would be willing to be primary wage earners if they have to work outside the home to do it.  Very few men aside of farmers and working artists could truly pull off active home based fatherhood without feeling that they are losing their masculinity, at least in the west.
Add this to the current widespread belief that if you don’t have sex with a guy before a commitment, he will value you less, and go find someone who will.  We’re made to feel insecure about our looks, told that our value as women rests in our looks, and therefore if we’re not “perfect” then we should be “more approachable” (read easier) to improve our chances of getting and keeping a man.
So the general strategy has become looking and behaving as if one is available and open to non committal sex, but blocking out perceived losers with hostility.  The slut act and placing one’s self in meat market venues is the wide net that draws in everybody who’s remotely physically attracted to you, and then you have to sort and throw back the fish you don’t really want.
Using these kinds of tactics often leads to situations in which you actually have to explain to a guy that you’re not interested in having casual sex with him.
Let that thought soak in for a minute.
Why would a rational person think that you would be interested in casual sex with them?  It’s because you dress and behave in a way that gives them the impression that you would be interested in casual sex with people, and they’re trying for their turn in the line.
I just don't.

I just don't.

If, on the other hand, you dress and behave in a way that says that you probably or certainly don’t do casual sex, you don’t need a bitch shield.  You have a prude shield.  Guys around you will understand that the default answer is no until you’re married or seriously committed.  Some may have a wishful thinking problem, but it will be easy to point out to them that they’re behaving irrationally without any smarmy, “Let’s just be friends…” speeches.

The thing is, to pull this off, you can’t screw guys outside of committed relationships.  It can’t be that sometimes you do, and sometimes you don’t.  You just don’t.  If you have in the past, you should chalk it up as experience, and stop.  Do your best to recover whatever you’ve lost from that.  You may need the help of a therapist or minister for awhile.
You also have to start dressing like someone who isn’t trying to pick up.  This does not mean uglifying yourself, or letting yourself go.  It also doesn’t mean acting as if you think sex is yucky.  It means not advertising your sexuality as if it were a product you’re selling.
Technically, once you do this, you’re selling your chastity, but at least this way you get to control who’s in your pool of buyers.  You are like an exclusive club for members only.  The default answer that should go through a guy’s mind who finds you attractive, to the question of whether or not he’s likely to get in, should be no.  Men should know in advance and on sight that they have no chance of getting pre commitment sex from you consensually, even if they are the king of wherever.  It’s just not going to happen.
This means that the guys who are looking for an easy lay will pass you over, or not put much effort into you once they understand the situation.  Good riddance.
This will be difficult for those of you who are used to getting a lot of male attention.  Attention is what passes for validation for many people nowadays, but it’s not the same thing.  It’s the type of attention that matters most.  Sometimes the lack of attention is the validation, and proof of your actual value as opposed to your usefulness.
If you’re not putting out, and not looking like you will, then being passed over by guys looking for an easy lay usually means they respect you too much to waste your time.  You may not be of much use to them at the moment, but you are still valuable.  The reason this is usually the case and not just sometimes, is because most guys ultimately want a committed relationship.  It’s just that when they’re young, they feel like they should be sowing their wild oats.  Yeah, they’ve been lied to the same way we have.
Hollywood waves the prospect of an endless parade of 10′s in front of them.  It’s like the Tyler Durden speech where he says that they were all told they were going to be rock stars and millionaires, but that didn’t happen, so they’re angry.  When they do come back down to earth, they are very put off by the bitch shield.  For years, they’ve had cleavage and butt crack dangling in front of their noses, but jerked away as soon as they’ve reached out to touch it, more often than not.
They’d rather be with someone who isn’t playing those childish games.  If you have substantially above average looks, you’ll need to suit up in order to not be seen as mere eye candy or a tease or mercenary.  If you have average or below average looks, you will need to suit up in order to not be viewed as easy and disposable.  The fact is that pretty, popular girls, whatever that means, can get away with more and still be generally valued.  The kinds of guys who don’t lose their testicles just because of a girl being pretty though, have very high standards of character and grooming, which is part of the evidence of character.
Now to the benefits of the prude shield…
You don’t have to wear makeup beyond the work and event standard.   Most men are not fooled by makeup anyway.  Some fetishists and television raised porn addicts prefer a woman to wear makeup, but even they are not actually fooled into thinking a woman is more pretty than she actually is.  For some men, makeup takes away more than it gives to a woman’s appearance.  So you can set your pores free, and you won’t get premature eye wrinkling…a big bonus for the long term.
You can be feminine without it being misinterpreted as easy.  Write those silly poems, and stare into his eyes.  Tell him how it makes you feel when he doesn’t call at least every couple of days, and don’t pretend that it doesn’t bother you.  Let the tears well up, and your voice shake if he starts evading or talking trash.  This is not a battle for supremacy.  It’s a relationship.  If he bails out, you will feel the loss, and you will be disappointed even though you will survive.
There is no chance of rapo gaming.  You’re old fashioned in the way that you don’t have a romantic relationship until the guy has both explicitly defined it as such to you, and is publically calling you his girlfriend, fiance, or wife.  You’re not seeing other people, or pressuring him, but you’re not counting your chickens before they’re hatched.  You also don’t like misunderstandings, or to waste others’ time or your own, and you prefer a mature and decisive partner.  You’ve made it clear that indecision is a pet peeve of yours, and at the point his indecisiveness starts to annoy you, you simply no longer respond to any of his vague flirtations.
You trigger a decent man’s protective urges, rather than his defensiveness.  If you’ve established yourself as the woman in the relationship from the beginning, you can be a bit flexible about some of the superficial gender roles without it being interpreted as a power play.  You can be a civil engineer or a receptionist, and either way you’re still a woman to him.  There is no dating like a man if you’re not a man, so masculinizing your style just gets you perceived as slutty, bitter, and/or domineering.  With the bitch shield, you’d be saying you don’t want to have sex with him because he’s not good enough.  A prude shield says you’re not having sex with him because he’s not yours, regardless of why.  That’s not about power.  It’s about protection.
What about the dangers of the prude shield?
The big one is that it could be interpreted as sexual manipulation in the bad way.  A guy could believe that you are witholding sex in order to pressure him to commit.
To counter this perception, you will have to first lose your delusions of grandeur.  If you won’t have sex with him, someone else out there will.  You can’t prevent a man from having sex in general.  All you can decide is what you will and won’t consent to.  So you have to make it clear that you are not interested in manipulating him because you understand that just leads to frustration and dishonesty.  You just don’t want sex from someone who isn’t committed to you because of your own standards.  He is welcome to opt out if this is too much pressure for him.
…which brings us to another danger.  Well, it’s not really a danger so much as it is collateral damage due to circumstances you could not anticipate.  That is the fact that it is a widespread social trend for men to be wusses these days.  There also seems to be a rise in uncareful promiscuity.  Since they figured out that the withdrawal method is passable birth control, many guys aren’t using condoms from start to finish every time.
So a guy may not feel that he should have to be in a committed relationship to have sex, but will pursue you in the hopes that you will change your mind.  He may think you were just kidding.  When he finds out you’re not, he’ll start distancing himself.  Let him go.
Another danger is that there are guys out there who are desperate enough to mock commitment up to the point that it doesn’t really cost them anything substantial.  It is very important that you not fall for professions of love and promises of the moon and stars.  Give it enough time to get confirmation from other sources that his word actually means something.  A wuss is never that way in just one area of his life.  If guys don’t trust him, girls shouldn’t either.
Then finally, there is the chance that you may be alone a very very long time.  In the day, they had a word for this, “spinster”.  Now, they’re called cat ladies.  If you keep your legs closed and behave honorably, like most honorable people, you may pay a high price for that.  This is why they call it honor.
On the other hand, part of being honorable is being true to yourself.  If you sincerely feel that you would rather end up a cat lady than a cougar, if it comes down to being romantically alone in your older age, then the prude shield will do you well.  You’ll have less needless drama in your life, and in your age, you will be looked on as a nurturing mentor.  Hey, some nice man may be secretly lusting after you, but waiting for his wife to die.
If, on the other hand, you need some action, and would be more miserable as a cat lady than a cougar, perhaps relative prudishness is not for you.  Hey, if you’re going to be a slut, then be an ethical one.  Might I interest you though, in a middle ground?
If you find yourself getting up there in age, and due to lack of luck, you haven’t found Mr. Right, consider life as a sassy broad.  Whatever you do, do it with discretion.  Hey, it’s a thought.

H. Beatty Chadwick is Finally Free!

  • Posted on July 16, 2009 at 9:09 pm

See this news report for more details.

For those who don’t know, H. Beatty Chadwick held his ground for 14 years, defying an order that would force him to put 2.5 million dollars into a court controlled account to pay his ex wife alimony.  Without a trial, he was simply imprisoned for contempt on the whim of a moralist judge and a greedy ex.

Before some of you scoff and call this a “poor little rich boy” story, be aware that what happens to men can happen to women.  You could work hard to become a multi millionaire, marry a younger man, get cancer, get dumped, and then have to pay the jerk millions of dollars or get thrown in jail indefinitely.

If you ever wondered why I say that civil marriage is a scam, and nobody should do it, refer to the Chadwick story.  He may have had more money at stake, but the same rules apply.

On the one hand, his ex wife is a greedy whore.  On the other, he was dumb enough to marry her.  One has to wonder how many great women who would have actually care for him, he passed by or stepped on to get to the Barbie of his nightmares.  In the long run he proved himself to be superhumanly tough in the face of exploitation, but where was all this determination when he chose to make paperwork with the phony, painted media prototype, rather than to put his needs above those of the herd?

If indeed his personal tastes and those of the masses just happened to coincide by chance or due to a preference for familiar features of his own heritage, he could have just cohabitated with her, or better, visited regularly.  If one doesn’t want to take the chance of a common law marriage, one can simply set up two separate residences under separate names.  Why did he not do this?

If your taste happens to overlap with the herd, you can’t be in denial of the implications.  This is a lesson for both men and women, rich and poor.  If you’re a woman who’s dating a man with money, you will for as long as the relationship lasts, be competing against other women of all types who will do just about anything to get into his pocket.  If you’re a man dating a woman with the Barbie look, you will always be competing against men of all types who want to get into her pants.  Regardless of a rich man’s initial desire to be faithful, he will be facing temptation to be a lecher for as long as he has money.  Regardless of a Barbie or whatever herd exalted type woman’s initial desire to be faithful, she will be facing temptation to be an active whore for as long as her “beauty” lasts, and as it fades her biological clock will push her into taking the money and running before she loses the leverage to succeed.

So follow the conservative policy “trust but verify”.  Love to the ends of the earth, and make whatever personal sacrifices it takes, but do not put your legal or financial testicles in anyone else’s hands.

Unspoken Rule: Straight Guys Don’t Do Anal

  • Posted on July 7, 2009 at 5:35 am

Well, except under special circumstances, such as their beloved wife asking them for it after performing three soap and water enemas and taking two loperamide, and even then vaginal is preferable.

When guys hear another guy obsessing over buttsecks, a little voice inside their heads is telling them that he’s Gay.  There’s nothing wrong with being Gay, but the dude is running a high risk if he should ever find himself incarcerated with people who know this about him.

Since most guys don’t go to jail for long periods, sending this message may not make them cell wives, but it will earn them some interesting nicknames behind their backs.  Since anal sex has become a staple of porn, most guys wouldn’t call a dude out for this in public.  Almost every one will experiment with it if he gets the opportunity.  It’s just that after doing it once or twice, a straight guy will not want to do that again unless he’s into poo.  Even some Gay guys prefer heroic man love over anal.

Why this rule is unspoken is due to a combination of middle class male peer pressure and feminist ideology.  To say that one hates anal sex, and thinks men who give or receive it past experimentation are Gay paints one as sexually inept and homophobic.   Men are afraid to be honest about their level of disgust for it.

For some, because of their hidden beliefs, there is shame after engaging in it at their partners’ request.  There’s also suspicion that the woman isn’t enjoying it, which is quite often the case.  She feels pressured to copy the porn queens to keep her man, and he feels pressured to copy the studs to keep up with her supposed needs and the other guys who all say that they’ve done it.  So at the end of the night, both have had sex like peer pressured puppets, and neither feels closer.  If they don’t speak honestly, they both feel pressured to repeat the activity, and slowly the guy starts feeling like even more of a “punk”.

So before you break out the KY jelly and prepare yourself to grin and bear it, ask your man how he feels about anal sex in a non pressure situation first.  If he gets a look on how face like he just tasted something bad, and you get the old girlfriend stories of poo, just let that go.

…and if one of his friends’ nicknames is Alfred Sh**cock, the two of you can have fun planning his coming out party.

Unspoken Rule: Cheating Women are Lucky to Be Alive

  • Posted on July 1, 2009 at 7:49 am

Times have changed, and in most places a guy can’t legally get away with putting a bullet in his cheating wife’s head, but a surprising number do so anyway.

Much like I’ve encountered when attempting to convince women to exercise and learn self defense, there seems to be a chasm between women’s perception of the facts of life, and the realities of life.  The world owes no human being on this earth anything.  Not one thing.  Not another breath, and definitely not mercy in response to betrayal.  If you get it, it’s only because of luck.  Don’t push your luck.

As a polyamory friendly person, I debated with myself as to whether or not to post this little tidbit and the last on cheating men.  I decided to go ahead and do it because truly polyamorous people are a minority.  Even they prefer honesty, and take being betrayed very seriously.   People trying to justify their continued existence often point to the polyamorous as an example of why cheating isn’t so bad, but we are not a good example.  Wanting for one’s sister what one wants for one’s self, as Muslims would word it, is not the same as being okay with him screwing every whore in town and risking his wives’ health.  Besides, from a PUA perspective, doing a bunch of women who just want the money is a “false alpha” behavior.  One wants to create the illusion of being wanted by many women, without doing the work to get the social pull which would get one the needed ego boost without having to have the sex…but I digress.

What year it is, and women’s rights are irrelevant in this.  I’m talking about how a man feels about being cheated on.  No matter what he says, he wants to kill or maim you if you do that.  That’s his natural reaction.  If you’re not dead, it’s only because he doesn’t want to deprive his children of their mother and/or he doesn’t think you’re worth life in prison.

So before you get carried away by the moment, and you can’t find it in you to think about the good man you have at home, consider that even good people have limits.  If you cross them, you’re taking your life into your hands.

…and if you have done it and survived, and you wonder why you’re not getting what you wanted out of the divorce, it’s because every time he hears your voice or gets anything from your lawyer, a tiny voice inside him is wishing you were dead.  Be a dear and remind him of your existence as infrequently as possible.